Two contradictory arguments of the Bank cannot run side by side that on one hand the action was taken on account of default committed as identified in the impugned RBI Guidelines and now on the other hand saying that the said RBI Guidelines should not be made the basis for quashing of the proceedings because only those cases are to be covered which are having exposure Rs. 20 billion or above and since in the present case the debt as per Bank of India Petition under Section 7 of the I&B Code in the capacity of Financial Creditor is much below therefore, legally not to be quashed. This plea of the Bank is not sustainable in the eyes of law because if it was so, then why the Banks have asked for a Resolution of the debt under the compliance of impugned guidelines of the RBI.
| Test Type | PAID |
|---|---|
| Total Words | 493 Words |
| Words Per Minutes | 120 WPM |
| Time | 25 min |
Why Steno Architect Certification Training
Take the first step!
Kailash Chandra Vol. 21
Legal Dictations