Learned Counsel for opposite party No. 2 vehemently opposed above argument with this contention that there was huge corruption in the office of applicants, ants, for which repeated complaint was being made by complainant, and no inquiry was got conducted, whereas documents regarding same were in the office of given section of the office concerned from where it may be taken and inquiry may be conducted, but no such inquiry was ever conducted and complainant was being victimized, wherefor above departmental enquiry was being constituted and proceeded, wherein complainant alongwith his colleague M.P. Tiwari, went for appearing in above enquiry.
| Test Type | PAID |
|---|---|
| Total Words | 495 Words |
| Words Per Minutes | 120 WPM |
| Time | 25 min |
Why Steno Architect Certification Training
Take the first step!
Kailash Chandra Vol. 21
Legal Dictations